Payment Digitalization: Regulatory Compliance or True Payment Flow Security?

Across different regions, regulatory initiatives are now structuring financial flow management frameworks in response to evolving payment practices, growing transaction volumes, and increasing risks.

The digitalization of financial processes, ERP-driven automation, the acceleration of payments, and the growing interconnection of information systems have profoundly transformed the payment chain.

These developments include:

  • The widespread adoption of instant payments in Europe

  • The reform of electronic invoicing and e-reporting in France

  • The gradual migration from checks to ACH transfers in the United States

These changes respond to major challenges:

  • Tax modernization

  • Improved traceability

  • Reduction of operational costs

  • Acceleration of financial flows

However, a strategic question remains:
Do these frameworks truly secure payment flows as a whole, throughout the entire process—from the integration of bank details to the execution of the payment?

France: electronic invoicing strengthens fiscal traceability

A structural reform for financial flow management

The French reform requires companies to be able to issue and receive invoices through approved platforms.

Through these platforms, data from all transactions will be transmitted to the tax authorities. This automation aims to reduce VAT fraud risks while modernizing tax management.

This reform is:

  • Fiscal

  • Technological

  • Structural

It fundamentally transforms the Order-to-Cash and Procure-to-Pay cycles.

A payment chain now fully integrated

In a digitalized environment, the payment chain becomes fully integrated within systems:

Vendor onboarding → Electronic invoice → Validation → Payment order → Transfer

Each step is connected through the ERP. Automation streamlines processes… but it also reduces intermediate human control points.

If fraudulent bank details are integrated when a supplier is created or modified, they can automatically propagate all the way to the payment.

The reform secures the invoice. It does not necessarily secure the reliability of the bank data used to pay that invoice.

Today, in the majority of B2B fraud cases, the attack point occurs precisely at the moment a supplier’s IBAN is modified.

The more automated the flows become, the more systemic the risk becomes.

The question is therefore no longer simply:
Are we ready for electronic invoicing?

But rather:
Can we secure the entire payment process in a fully automated environment?

Europe: instant payments and Verification of Payee

Payment acceleration changes the timing of risk

With the widespread adoption of instant payments across Europe, payments can now be executed within seconds, 24/7.

This evolution brings several benefits :

  • Better treasury management

  • Faster commercial exchanges

  • Reduced interbank processing delays

However, it also changes risk management:

  • Recall options are significantly reduced

  • The time available to detect anomalies becomes extremely short

  • The irreversibility of payments increases the importance of upstream controls

Controls can therefore no longer occur only after the payment has been issued.

Reliability and continuity of payment flows

Mechanisms such as Verification of Payee (VoP) represent an important step forward by strengthening controls at the moment a payment is initiated.

However, in an environment where bank details continuously circulate between ERPs, accounting platforms, and banking systems, reliability must be assessed:

  • At the time of integration

  • During modifications

  • Throughout the entire lifecycle

Even when certain features are not activated by default, ensuring the continuous reliability of bank data remains essential to reducing fraud risks.

cta demo EN

United States: The migration toward ACH increases risk exposure

A massive transition from checks to transfers

Historically, American companies have relied heavily on check payments.

However, this practice is rapidly declining.

According to the Association for Financial Professionals (AFP):

  • Only 26% of companies still primarily use checks

  • 72% plan to migrate toward transfers by 2027

ACH payments increased by 16.7% compared to 2024, with 1.45 billion payments exchanged, representing a total value of $3.92 trillion.

This transition toward faster and more automated electronic payments mechanically increases exposure to fraud risks related to bank account details.

NACHA: a framework structuring payment controls

NACHA (National Automated Clearing House Association) is not a legal authority but the organization responsible for governing electronic transfers in the United States through the ACH network. It defines industry standards and best practices, including those related to fraud prevention for electronic payments.

Within this framework, companies are responsible for the security of the transactions they initiate. They must therefore be able to prevent fraud before transfers are sent, rather than simply react after an incident.

In practice, this means companies must:

  • Identify fraud risks related to bank details as soon as they are entered or modified, to prevent unsecured payments from being executed

  • Implement structured and consistent controls directly integrated into automated financial processes

  • Document their control mechanisms in order to demonstrate that verification procedures are systematic and repeatable

  • Assume operational responsibility: in the event of fraud, compliance depends on the robustness of the controls applied to the data triggering the payment, not solely on the correct execution of the transfer

In other words, NACHA requires organizations to adopt a “commercially reasonable” approach: companies must demonstrate that they take all appropriate measures to secure payments at their source.

This framework highlights the importance of strong operational safeguards across the entire payment lifecycle, particularly in environments where financial flows are highly automated.

From regulatory vulnerability to operational security

Limitations of current regulatory frameworks

Across France, Europe, and the United States, regulations improve traceability and compliance, but they do not fully secure the entire payment cycle:

  • Electronic invoicing secures fiscal data, but not bank data

  • Instant payments and VoP strengthen security at the payment stage, while upstream data reliability remains critical

  • NACHA defines control obligations but does not prescribe detailed operational mechanisms

  • Automated financial flows can quickly propagate errors or fraudulent data

Ensuring the continuous reliability of bank data therefore becomes a cross-functional and strategic priority.

Measures and practices to strengthen payment reliability

Sis ID helps companies integrate security directly into the core of their payment processes. The solution relies on a global network of banking databases covering more than 200 countries, with enhanced controls across major economic regions.

Each connection to these banking databases provides access to reliable and up-to-date information about third-party and corporate bank details. This extensive data coverage offers several benefits:

  • Strengthen data reliability from a single source: access to centralized banking databases helps verify the consistency and accuracy of bank details, reducing errors when integrating or modifying IBAN information.

  • Detect and secure fraud attempts: the analysis of banking details helps quickly identify anomalies or suspicious changes, preventing fraud before payments are issued.

  • Enhanced compliance through verification evidence: every verification generates a traceable record, enabling organizations to demonstrate that appropriate checks have been performed and facilitating compliance and audit requirements.

All within a single solution directly integrated into financial processes.

Beyond simple point-in-time verification, Sis ID ensures continuous and comprehensive security of financial flows, with strengthened coverage across more than 200 strategic geographies worldwide.

Stronger Together

FAQ

Need to learn more?

Regulation protects businesses and consumers from abuse, fraud, and financial risks, while ensuring market transparency and stability.

Regulation protects businesses and consumers from abuse, fraud, and financial risks, while ensuring market transparency and stability.

Regulation protects businesses and consumers from abuse, fraud, and financial risks, while ensuring market transparency and stability.

Regulation protects businesses and consumers from abuse, fraud, and financial risks, while ensuring market transparency and stability.

I choose my network and I share!